• Home
  • About

GIScience News Blog

News of Heidelberg University’s GIScience Research Group.

Feed on
Posts
Comments
« 3rd CFP: Journal Special Issue “VGI Analytics” in Geo-Spatial Information Science and AGILE workshop
Reminder Deadline for Open Position: Innovation Management Geoinformation Technology »

Completeness of Citizen Science Biodiversity Data from a Volunteered Geographic Information Perspective

Mar 1st, 2017 by GIScienceHD

Observations of living organisms by citizen scientists that are reported to online portals are a valuable source of information. They are also a special kind of volunteered geographic information (VGI). VGI data have issues of completeness, which arise from biases caused by the opportunistic nature of the data collection process. We examined the completeness of bird species represented in citizen science observation data from eBird and iNaturalist in US National Parks (NPs). We used approaches for completeness estimation which were developed for data from OpenStreetMap, a crowdsourced map of the world. First, we used an extrinsic approach, comparing species lists from citizen science data with National Park Service lists. Second, we examined two intrinsic approaches using total observation numbers in NPs and the development of the number of new species being added to the data-set over time. Results from the extrinsic approach provided appropriate completeness estimations to evaluate the intrinsic approaches. We found that total observation numbers are a good estimator of species completeness of citizen science data from US NPs. There is also a close relationship between species completeness and the ratio of new species added to observation data vs. observation numbers in a given year.
Future work should examine how far the results of this study can be reproduced with citizen science observation data-sets obtained from other projects with different properties, or with the same data-sets used in this study, but for other regions with different observation rates. Another important question is how our approaches would perform if applied to other species groups with different characteristics concerning mobility, detectability, and others. However, for any extrinsic completeness estimation as conducted in this study, there is always the difficulty of finding a suitable extrinsic source of reference data, especially for small focus regions.

Jacobs C. and A. Zipf (2017): Completeness of Citizen Science Biodiversity Data from a Volunteered Geographic Information Perspective. Geo-Spatial information Science, 2017. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2017.1288424.

(Related work)

Tags: biodiversity, Citizen Science, Completeness, intrinsic quality analysis, VGI

Posted in Publications, Research

Comments are closed.

  • About

    GIScience News Blog
    News of Heidelberg University’s GIScience Research Group.
    There are 1,500 Posts and 0 Comments so far.

  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Recent Posts

    • HELIOS++ v1.0.6 released
    • HeiGIT und DRK veröffentlichen weiteres Trainingsmaterial zu Mapathons 
    • German Mass Vaccination Sites in Open Healthcare Access Map
    • ohsome-py: Python Package for OSM history analytics published
    • Mapathon “Mapping for International Solidarity” on 06.04
  • Tags

    3D 3DGEO Big Spatial Data CAP4Access Citizen Science Colloquium crisis mapping Crowdsourcing data quality disaster DisasterMapping GeoNet.MRN GIScience heigit HOT humanitarian Humanitarian OpenStreetMap team intrinsic quality analysis isochrones landuse laser scanning Lidar Mapathon MapSwipe Missing Maps MissingMaps ohsome ohsome example Open data openrouteservice OpenStreetMap OSM OSM History Analytics OSMlanduse Quality quality analysis remote sensing routing social media spatial analysis Teaching terrestrial laser scanning VGI Wheelchair Navigation Workshop
  • Archives

    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
  •  

    March 2017
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Recent Comments

    GIScience News Blog CC by-nc-sa Some Rights Reserved.

    Free WordPress Themes | Fresh WordPress Themes