• Home
  • About

GIScience News Blog

News of Heidelberg University’s GIScience Research Group.

Feed on
Posts
Comments
« Understanding human mobility from social media data for epidemic surveillance in urban environment
Constraints in multi-objective optimization of land use allocation – Repair or penalize? »

Comparison of Three Algorithms for the Evaluation of TanDEM-X Data for Gully Detection in Krumhuk Farm (Namibia)

Jun 5th, 2019 by Vivien Zahs

Namibia is a dry and low populated country highly dependent on agriculture, with many areas experiencing land degradation accelerated by climate change. One of the most obvious and damaging manifestations of these degradation processes are gullies, which lead to great economic losses while accelerating desertification.

The development of standardized methods to detect and monitor the evolution of gully-affected areas is crucial to plan prevention and remediation strategies.

This paper explores fully automated satellite-based remote sensing methods with the aim of developing solutions applicable at a regional or even national scale. For this purpose, three different algorithms are applied to a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) generated from the TanDEM-X satellite mission to extract gullies from their geomorphological characteristics: (i) Inverted Morphological Reconstruction (IMR), (ii) Smoothing Moving Polynomial Fitting (SMPF) and (iii) Multi Profile Curvature Analysis (MPCA). These algorithms are adapted or newly developed to identify gullies at the pixel level (12 m) in our study site in the Krumhuk Farm. The results of the three methods are benchmarked with ground truth; specific scenarios are observed to better understand the performance of each method.

XX

Results of the different gully classification methods for one validation plot.

Results show that MPCA is the most reliable method to identify gullies, achieving an overall accuracy of ca. 0.80 with values of Cohen Kappa close to 0.35. The performance of these parameters improves when detecting large gullies (>30 m width and >3 m depth) achieving Total Accuracies (TA) near to 0.90, Cohen Kappa above 0.5, and User Accuracy (UA) and Producer Accuracy (PA) over 0.50 for the gully class. Small gullies (<12 m wide and <2 m deep) are usually neglected in the classification results due to spatial resolution constraints within the input DEM. In addition, IMR generates accurate results for UA in the gully class (0.94).

The MPCA method developed here is a promising tool for the identification of large gullies considering extensive study areas. Nevertheless, further development is needed to improve the accuracy of the algorithms, as well as to derive geomorphological gully parameters (e.g., perimeter and volume) instead of pixel-level classification.

Find all details in the full paper:

  • Orti, M.V., Negussie, K., Corral-Pazos-de-Provens, E., Höfle, B. & Bubenzer, O. (2019): Comparison of Three Algorithms for the Evaluation of TanDEM-X Data for Gully Detection in Krumhuk Farm (Namibia). Remote Sensing. Vol. 11 (11), pp. 1-22.
The research of this paper is complementary to the project DEM_HYDR2024, funded by the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) for the used TanDEM-X datasets. Fieldwork campaigns needed for this research were funded by Integrated Land Management Institute (ILMI, grant number RY210400) and by the Department of Geo-Spatial Science and Technology at Namibia University of Science and Technology. Financial support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for Open Access Publishing.
Methods of gully detection and monitoring are the core research subject of the PhD project of Miguel Orti on the development of gully identification and measurement methods combining remote sensing and crowdsourcing techniques.

Find out about the 3DGeo group’s work in further geomorphic settings, such as costal environments in the Netherlands, snow cover monitoring at Zugspitze mountain and rock glacier surface changes in the Austrian alps.

Tags: automatization, degradation, Digital Elevation Model, geomorphological reconstruction, gully detection, Gully erosion, namibia, polynomial surface fitting, remote sensing, TanDEM-X

Posted in 3D, Digital Earth, Lidar Group, Publications, Research

Comments are closed.

  • About

    GIScience News Blog
    News of Heidelberg University’s GIScience Research Group.
    There are 1,462 Posts and 0 Comments so far.

  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Recent Posts

    • Updated OSM Healthcare in Senegal (2020)
    • Find the route to your nearest Covid-19 vaccination center in Germany — new App by HeiGIT based on OpenStreetMap and openrouteservice
    • ohsome street network analysis part 1
    • Keynote at McGILL GIS DAY: Analysing and Improving OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Aid with Data Mining and GeoAI
    • Update on “Accessibility of COVID-19 vaccination centers in Germany”
  • Tags

    3D 3DGEO Big Spatial Data CAP4Access Citizen Science Colloquium crisis mapping Crowdsourcing data quality disaster DisasterMapping GeoNet.MRN GIScience heigit HOT humanitarian Humanitarian OpenStreetMap team intrinsic quality analysis landuse laser scanning Lidar Mapathon MapSwipe Missing Maps MissingMaps ohsome ohsome example Open data openrouteservice OpenStreetMap OSM OSM History Analytics OSMlanduse Quality quality analysis remote sensing routing social media spatial analysis Teaching terrestrial laser scanning Twitter VGI Wheelchair Navigation Workshop
  • Archives

    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
  •  

    June 2019
    M T W T F S S
    « May   Jul »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
  • Recent Comments

    GIScience News Blog CC by-nc-sa Some Rights Reserved.

    Free WordPress Themes | Fresh WordPress Themes